Translate

Tupac Amaru Shakur, " I'm Loosing It...We MUST Unite!"
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Biden: Trump's view of suburbs is 'not who we are'


President Donald Trump "wouldn't know a suburb unless he took a wrong turn," Democratic nominee Joe Biden said during a television interview, slamming the president's view of the suburbs as outdated and "not who we are."

Biden made the comments during an interview on "60 Minutes" which aired on Sunday. Trump also sat for an interview with the news show, but left abruptly before his portion was finished; as a preemptive strike, the White House released Trump's interview with Lesley Stahl days before it aired on CBS.

"He wouldn't know a suburb unless he took a wrong turn. Go out in the suburbs now. It's not 1950," Biden told Norah O’Donnell. "There's a lot of reasons people are upset. A lot of good reasons. All he wants to do is take that sort of subliminal fear out there and say, 'It's because — because of that guy, or because of that woman.' That's not who we are as a country."

In the final days of the presidential race, many of the suburban white women who supported Trump in key battleground states in 2016 say they prefer Biden this year, according to recent polls.

Trump has made an appeal to suburban voters in the final weeks of the 2020 race, asking, “Suburban women, will you please like me?” Trump said during his "60 Minutes" interview that he was joking when he said the line at a Pittsburgh rally, but then made another appeal to the suburbs.

"I got rid of a regulation," Trump said. "That would bring low-income housing into suburbia that is destroying — that would destroy suburbia."

Trump's view of the suburbs is harmful to democracy, Biden said.

"We've always gone further and further and further toward inclusion. This is the first president who's trying to shut it down. We cannot sustain this democracy that way. We're so much better than this," Biden said.

Vice President Mike Pence and vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris were also interviewed.

Harris echoed Biden's message during her interview. The president has called Harris "nasty" on the campaign trail, among other names.

Asked whether she believes Trump is racist, Harris said "Yes, I do" and pointed to Trump's role in questioning where President Barack Obama was born.

"You can look at a pattern that goes back to him questioning the identity of the first Black president of the United States. You can look at Charlottesville, when there were peaceful protesters, and on the other side, neo-Nazis, and he talks about fine people on either side. Calling Mexicans rapists and criminals. His first order of business was to institute a Muslim ban. It all speaks for itself," Harris said.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2ToJgEN
via 400 Since 1619

Conservatives on track to win Lithuania’s election

Ingrida Šimonytė’s Homeland Union tops the vote.

from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2HBHFJx
via 400 Since 1619

Voters ask who abandoned Scranton, Biden or Trump?


SCRANTON, PA — President Donald Trump has chalked up his upset 2016 victory to America’s “forgotten men and women,” but in this northeastern Pennsylvania city, voters take that theme more literally than most.

In many cases, their feelings about the election boil down to which candidate forgot them. Was it Donald Trump, who promised the region an economic renaissance that never materialized, or Joe Biden, who grew up here from birth until the age of 10 but has since spent his career in the upper echelons of the Democratic Party?

As Biden frames his campaign as “Scranton Versus Park Avenue,” while Trump claims his challenger “abandoned Scranton” — a characterization the Philadelphia Inquirer called a “distortion” — the question has become something of a running issue here. Trump threw more oil on the fire with his comment in Thursday’s debate that Biden “didn’t come from Scranton. He lived there for a short period of time before he even knew it and he left. And the people of Pennsylvania will show you that. They understand.”

Biden’s supporters, however, fondly recall years of surprise run-ins with Biden at restaurants downtown and the calls he made to sick or grieving locals. His detractors scoff that he’s a fair-weather friend to Scranton, and, besides, only lived here something like eight years, or a few years, or in one case “six months.”

"The naysayers are saying he hasn’t been here,” said Evie Rafalko-McNulty, a local Democratic activist. “That's a lie!"

Rafalko-McNulty recalled Biden checking in with her late husband, former Scranton Mayor James McNulty, on regular swings through town, and a campaign stop he made on a steamy 3rd of July in 2012. She credited Biden with helping steer funding to Steamtown, a railroad museum downtown, and for calling to offer condolences when her husband died in 2016.

"Joe's a Scranton guy," vouched Russell Preno III, a restaurant proprietor, whose family has known Biden’s at least since Preno’s grandfather and Biden’s father became friends before Biden’s birth.

Preeno, 38, recalled Biden stopping in regularly at his family’s restaurant over the years to pick up tomato sauce. Preno said that in the middle of a 2013 fundraising event Biden attended at his restaurant, the then-vice president learned that Preno’s Aunt Peggy was dying of leukemia. Biden, he said, cut out of the event to make a 10-minute phone call to her. When Preno’s own father died a year later, Biden called three times in two days, and had Preno email over the eulogy he delivered, he recalled.



Not everyone is moved. "He only comes here when he's pandering for votes," said Marc Pane, a mechanic, pausing from work on a Honda Accord on a dreary Columbus Day afternoon.

"He left and never came back to give us jobs," said Thaz Whalen, 41, a server at Backyard Alehouse downtown.

Accusations of abandonment and fears about false friends are the very visible residue of decades of unrelenting loss of blue-collar jobs. Once a thriving industrial center for coal mining, manufacturing and railroads, the Scranton area — nestled in the Lackawanna Valley — has been one of the nation’s prime victims of economic change. A handsome and imposing 19th century courthouse downtown hints at its prosperous past. But even in the tonier sections of town, most of the houses are modest, and some cry out for a new coat of paint.

As of August, the area had an 11.7 percent unemployment rate, among the worst in the state.

That may prove a bigger liability for the incumbent. Trump made big promises about reviving the region’s economic vitality at rallies here in 2016, proclaiming “we are going to put the miners and the factory workers and the steel workers back to work,” the day before the election. But the results have been middling. As of August, the state had fewer coal mining jobs than when Trump took office, despite his efforts to relax environmental restrictions.

“He got a lot of these people convinced that our companies were going to come back, that he was going to get places like Scranton back on their feet, that he was going to bring our jobs back. But that was a lie,” Scranton voter Roberta Sepkowski told a POLITICO reporter this summer. “I knew it was a lie. It’s worse than ever.”

Joe Biden’s immediate family left Scranton for Delaware in the early 1950s, but he has regularly come back to visit with family and friends throughout his life. He returned two months into his first Senate term in 1973 to speak at a Saint Patrick’s Day dinner put on by the Friendly Sons of Saint Patrick, and continued to make visits in the intervening decades, including about a dozen public stops during his vice presidency.

Former mayor Jim Connors — who served terms as both a Republican and a Democrat and was a delegate to this summer’s Democratic National Convention — said Biden returned for Little League opening days and to stop by Joyce’s, a bar run by Connors’ cousin.

Connors’ wife, Susan Blum Connors, provided old photos of Biden visits, the cut of the suits testifying to their ’70s and ’80s vintages. She recalled a fundraiser for Biden at Fox Hill Country Club in nearby Exeter last October, where the candidate insisted on making a phone call to her 96-year-old mother. “He really is a mensch,” Blum Connors said, echoing the theme of a letter to the editor she recently published in the Scranton Times Tribune.



Soon, vote tallies will show whether all those decades of schmoozing have paid off. Public polling in Pennsylvania gives Biden an edge, while voter registration trends in the state have been favorable to Republicans. Biden’s ability to run up the score in Scranton, part of Lackawanna County, and cut into Trump’s 2016 margins in neighboring Luzerne county, or even flip it, will be critical to his statewide fortunes.

Like other Trump backers here, Pane — who recently appeared in an ad for the pro-Trump super PAC America First Action — said support for Trump in Scranton was less overt than it was for the hometown candidate, but he spoke of a “huge silent majority.”

In this overwhelmingly white county, Black Lives Matter yard signs are a rarity, far outnumbered by signs of support for local police departments, which share lawns with both Trump and Biden signs.

On North Washington Avenue in the Green Ridge section of town, on the block that Biden grew up, pro-Biden signage, including “Scranton Loves Joe!” signs, far outstrips visible support for Trump.

Some in town, though, who are not lifelong Scrantonians, are not even aware of the connection. Despite living in the area for about 20 years, Alejandro Caraballo, a 45-year-old subcontractor at work on a house across the street from Biden’s childhood home, said he was unaware that Scranton was Biden’s hometown. “Actually, I heard Trump was from here but I knew it was a lie,” said Carabello, a Trump supporter, citing the real estate mogul’s well-known New York upbringing.

As if to clear up any misunderstanding, the Times Tribune weighed in in August with a front page declaring, “THE ROOTS ARE REAL,” featuring testimony from locals who have stayed in touch.

Biden’s late mother, Jean Finnegan Biden, had Scranton roots stretching back to the 19th century, and several relatives remaining in the area buttress those ties. Despite a report that Biden’s Scranton relatives had gone for Trump in 2016, cousin Ambrose Finnegan, who now lives outside of Philadelphia, said his relatives have all continued to support Democrats, and are all in on their cousin’s White House bid. “He’s always made a sincere effort to touch base with his family whenever he’s in Scranton,” Finnegan said.

Over at Finnegan’s Irish Rock Club, a grungy dive bar in a section of town dominated by car dealerships, the sentiment is different.


"Dude, he left here when he was eight," said proprietor Kevin Locker, rounding down. "He likes to come back to the area for show." (It turns out the bar’s name is not an homage to Biden’s maternal line, but instead to Locker’s three-year-old “chiweenie,” a cross between a chihuahua and a dachshund.)

At Backyard Ale House, Whalen said he found Biden’s invocations of Scranton eye roll-inducing. "You spent six months here when you were a kid," he said, rounding way down.

Whalen said patrons at his bar, as well as friends he has seen posting on Facebook, have taken to playing a drinking game during debates and town halls that calls for them to take a swig every time the former vice president mentions his hometown.

A Republican who voted for Gary Johnson in 2016, Whalen said he will hold his nose and vote for Biden anyway. Whalen said he blamed Trump for the summer’s nationwide unrest, another hint of the incumbent’s problems with the white working class here. “He tear gassed his own people," Whalen said, referring to a June incident in which law enforcement sprayed protesters outside the White House to clear the way for Trump to walk to a photo opportunity at a nearby church.

At Cooper’s Seafood — a campy local institution that is shaped like a lighthouse, with a giant octopus on its roof — bartender Tommy Lin, 45, said attitudes towards Biden’s Scranton roots tend to break along generational lines. “My older customers, there's definitely a sense of pride," he said. "Anybody 50 or under seems to be more aloof of it."

Delaney, a 24-year-old patron who declined to provide her last name, drove home the point. "I feel like no one even really counts him as being from here," she said.

The seafood joint plays up a less polarizing claim to fame, with decor nodding to the Scranton-based sitcom “The Office,” featuring clueless boss Michael Scott and his eccentric underling, Dwight Schrute.

The electronic sign in the restaurant’s parking lot, at least, acknowledged the local angle to the impending vote. It even offered an endorsement: “Scott/Schrute ’20”




from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2FY8fvF
via 400 Since 1619

Trump team bets on local coverage to cover cash shortfall


The cash-hungry Trump campaign has turned to a cheaper strategy to try to remain on the airwaves, flooding TV and radio through local media bookings and back-to-back-to-back rallies.

But the gambit has been challenged by a trail of negative headlines that have followed the president: articles about rallies that eschew pandemic guidelines, news of people sickened by coronavirus afterward, spats with local officials that dominate regional coverage before and after a visit.

Still, it’s a strategy Trump and his team are leaning on in the final stretch of the election. Both the Trump and Biden campaigns are trying to reach voters for a last-minute, get-out-the-vote pitch. And for the Trump campaign, down in the polls and facing a funding shortfall, its local news strategy will be critical as it tries to make up for lost ground.

Biden’s camp has nearly three times as much cash on hand as Trump’s team, according to recent campaign filings, and is using its funds on expensive buys like 30-second spots during National Football League games. Without the same money to spend, the Trump campaign has instead leaned on its booking operation to get Trump and hundreds of surrogates on local TV and radio stations.

“Tip O’Neill’s axiom that all politics is local holds true, particularly on local news and talk radio,” said Corey Lewandowski, a campaign adviser and surrogate for Trump. “That is money we don't need to spend on paid advertising and because we have an opportunity to tailor messages to local places.”

The Trump team’s local news push is part of an effort by the Republican National Committee, the Trump campaign and the White House to build out an operation focused on regional media booking. With a president acutely aware of media coverage, RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has expanded the GOP’s booking operation, which is responsible for placing hundreds of surrogates, including the Trump kids, on radio and TV programs around the country. According to the RNC, the team has grown from two to 15 staffers, allowing the party to book surrogates for four times as many interviews as it did in 2016.

Last week alone, Trump Victory — the joint effort between the RNC and the Trump campaign — booked Republican surrogates, including those at the state and national level, on over 500 local TV and radio shows, according to data the RNC provided.

Yet the local coverage has led to some awkward moments, particularly when local reporters press the president or his surrogates on why the campaign continues to hold large, crowded rallies without mandatory mask wearing or any social distancing.

“Your own health experts say avoid crowds and a lack of compliance would lead to preventable death,” interjected anchor Charles Benson of WTMJ-TV in Milwaukee when the president was defending the decision.

Trump has also traveled to Covid hot spots to hold rallies, putting a spotlight on his handling of a pandemic that has killed over 223,000 Americans and infected many senior White House staffers, including the president.

Then there’s the coronavirus cases Trump’s rallies have occasionally left in their wake. After two campaign stops in Minnesota, 16 cases were linked to one rally in Bemidji, and three additional cases were linked to another rally in Duluth, according to local health officials. While the numbers aren’t large, they do generate unflattering local coverage.

Targeting local news coverage and blasting out surrogates to appear on shows is an age-old campaign strategy.

The Biden campaign, for instance, booked Biden and his top campaign surrogates for over 290 local radio and television hits in the month of September. On the last day of September, Biden and his most prominent backers, like Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a popular Democrat in the key state of Minnesota, and former Secretary of State John Kerry, the party’s 2004 presidential nominee, gave over 25 interviews on TV and radio.


But after several months of record fundraising, the Biden team can also pour resources into advertising.

The Trump campaign has tried to draw a contrast with the Biden campaign’s efforts by highlighting its grassroots efforts and broad surrogate operation. The RNC boasted that in the past week, its doorknockers have hit nearly four million homes, while its surrogates had given over 500 regional TV and radio interviews.

“This is really a tale of two campaigns. Joe Biden is putting it all on TV,” Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said on a call with reporters this week. “We have lots of TV ads. But in addition to that, we’re actually running a real campaign with voter contact, a campaign with events, a campaign with surrogates.”

Biden campaign spokesperson TJ Ducklo said the Trump team strategy was one merely crafted “out of necessity.”

“We have been a local media-first campaign since the primary,” he said. “Part of that emphasis has been understanding that we need to meet people where they are.”

Still, concentrating on local coverage has been an outsized priority for a president who has a love-hate relationship with national news media, vilifying outlets for critical coverage while simultaneously courting them. The president and his team say they get better coverage at the local level, arguing that even if national outlets ignore a rally or regional event, the local outlets will still be there, delivering for the audiences the president needs to win over.

For instance, the Trump campaign has argued that local media has picked up the mantle on covering recent stories about Hunter Biden’s business dealings. National press has covered the story with skepticism, given the lack of verifiable evidence and warnings from national security veterans that elements of the story bear the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation plot.

“The national news media has been unwilling to write about this story even though it has been staring them right in the face,” Trump campaign spokesperson Tim Murtaugh said Saturday on a call with reporters. “But we have seen over and over again local news outlets in states have been willing to actually cover the news and ask these questions of Joe Biden.”

It’s a refrain the president has used before.

“It’s really sad,” Trump said to conservative radio host Mark Levin in a September interview about national news coverage. But, Trump added, “I get great local [coverage]. You know, whenever I stop, like for a speech whenever I set up for a speech, I do one or two [interviews with] local reporters. These are the greatest stories, it's like, unbelievable. They cover it so good — actually they're almost more enthusiastic than I am.”

The White House will frequently give exclusive information to local news outlets where the president plans to travel, and has made local news access a priority across the administration. Over the past year, the administration has granted over 3,000 interviews with officials to regional radio and television outlets, according to the administration.

”Local television, print and radio outlets provide this administration an opportunity to bypass the opinion narratives that dominate the inside-the-beltway press corps, and engage in real dialogue and discussion about the issues that matter to the people of this great nation,” said John Horstman, White House director of media affairs, in a statement.

Even the country’s top diplomat, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, has been traveling to key states, making appearances and giving local interviews. In Texas, he made an appearance at a politically influential mega church. In Wisconsin, he addressed the state legislature and talked to local press.

But Pompeo’s Wisconsin trip showed the two sides that can come with such an effort. In Milwaukee, the secretary of State was hit with a series of questions about the timing of the appearance and the flurry of interviews he was giving.

“Why travel to a battleground state 41 days before the election?” asked one reporter from Milwaukee. “Did the campaign have any role in that?”




from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/3jtR3M0
via 400 Since 1619

They’re Afraid. They’re Buying Guns. But They’re Not Voting for Trump.


AUSTIN, Texas—Noah Horner always wanted a gun, but the 24-year-old tech company engineer had never been motivated enough to follow through. At least until this year, when coronavirus shut down the country, the economy tanked, unemployment spiked, more than 220,000 died, and a series of killings by police inspired thousands of protests, some of which turned violent.

Six weeks ago, because of what he understatedly calls “the current environment,” Horner bought his first firearm, a Glock 43X handgun that he keeps in his nightstand while he sleeps. But he didn’t want just to protect himself at home. He was worried he might need it as he was going about his daily life. In Austin, an Army sergeant had shot and killed a protester he said pointed a rifle at him after he turned his car onto a street where a demonstration was taking place. Horner wondered: What if I had to confront protesters alone at night? But if Horner wanted to be able to carry his new weapon in public, he’d need a license. Which is why on a recent Saturday morning, he drove to a strip mall in South Austin to sit in a windowless classroom at Central Texas Gun Works.

The class of about 20 people was being taught by the store’s owner, Michael Cargill, who offers up to four classes a week; the Saturday sessions are booked weeks in advance. He said he has noticed a shift in his clientele this year. Typically, Cargill’s customers are mostly conservative, he said, and the people enrolled in his license to carry classes are a mix of Republicans, Democrats and Libertarians. But lately, he said, the majority of the students are coming from the left side of the political spectrum.



For months Donald Trump has tweeted “LAW & ORDER” in all caps and cast himself as a “tough on crime” leader who will quell the unrest that defined the summer. He warned the “suburban housewives of America” that Joe Biden would destroy their neighborhoods. It’s a message that seems designed to appeal to anxious people like Horner. But it isn’t.

Horner told me he doesn’t consider himself political, but he said he’s planning to vote for Biden. He thinks Trump has embarrassed the country and mishandled the pandemic. Two others in the class, a young couple, described themselves as left-leaning, and they both have cast early ballots for Biden. Zachary Harris, 23, and his fiancée, 24-year-old Amy Taylor, purchased their first firearms about six months before the course—a shotgun, a .22 rifle and a handgun. Even though Taylor grew up around guns, they were both wary of the dangers the weapons posed if they didn’t handle them carefully. But soon they expected to have something to protect—a child. And as a woman, Taylor felt vulnerable. Harris, who said he once would have described himself as anti-gun, said they’re not alone among their left-leaning friends who are also considering what kinds of weapons they should own.



Across the country, gun sales are high. Ammunition is sold out. And Cargill, among other retailers, is selling more firearms to first-time buyers. Gun retailers in the United States estimate that 40 percent of their sales during the first four months of 2020 were to first-time buyers compared with an annual average of 24 percent in years past, according to a survey conducted by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearm industry’s trade association.
Between Jan. 1 and Sept. 30, about 15.4 million background checks were conducted nationally, said Mark Oliva, public affairs director for the foundation. That’s more than all of 2019, and quickly approaching the all-time record of 15.7 million checks in 2016, when Hillary Clinton was running for president.

Gun sales typically rise during an election year, but 2020, Oliva said, has been “unlike any other.” And the demographics of gun buyers appear to be shifting, too. Retailers are selling to more women, and more Black men and women, than in previous years. Oliva, who is a 47-year-old, white Marine veteran, said gun owners are starting to look less like him and more like Cargill, who is Black. Sales data don’t provide clues about buyers’ politics. But Cargill’s interactions with his customers across the counter tell him that talk about civil unrest around the upcoming election is just one more reason people are feeling anxious enough to buy a weapon now.

“If I dial 911, I’m not going to get the police officer,” Cargill said, explaining how some people have weighed the decision to arm themselves, “I’m going to have to be my own first responder. I’m going to have to get a gun.”





Like some of his new clients, Michael Cargill may not meet everyone’s expectations about the kinds of people who pack heat. Cargill is gay, Black and Republican. In recent years, he’s both pushed back on the county GOP for rejecting LGBT candidates for precinct chair positions and sued the federal government over its ban on so-called bump stocks that permit more rapid firing. His pickup truck has a license plate that says “Come and Take It” and he hosts a talk radio show called “Come and Talk It.” But that spirit of defiance doesn’t extend to the state’s pandemic-era mask mandate. Before Cargill allows people to enter Central Texas Gun Works for their license to carry class, he makes sure they’re wearing a face covering and then he takes their temperature. In the classroom, he wields a spray bottle of hand sanitizer, circling the room and spritzing open palms as he goes.

On this Saturday, wearing a clear face shield and a gun holster clipped to his belt, Cargill stood at the head of the room, explaining the steps everyone would have to take to secure their license to carry a firearm in the state of Texas. They would need to prove they could shoot proficiently and pass a written examination, which Cargill reassured them virtually no one in his classes had ever failed. Over the course of the five-hour class, not counting the time the group spent at the shooting range, Cargill talked about how to hold a handgun and how to identify their dominant eye to help them aim. He covered how to properly conceal a weapon in a vehicle, what crimes could result in a license suspension, and what states recognize Texas license-to-carry permits. One poster hanging on the wall reads, “Where can I legally carry in Texas?” The list includes the state capitol.

“You can get kicked out of the capitol for yelling but not for carrying a gun,” Cargill said, clapping his hands joyfully. “I’m never leaving Texas!”

Later, he also explained under what circumstances they could draw their guns or use lethal force. Many of the people in the class had specific scenarios that have preoccupied them. Amy Taylor, the engaged 20-something, asked under what circumstances she could pull her gun if she were out with a friend and a man started to forcibly drag her away. Preventing an aggravated kidnapping is definitely justified, he told her.

Then Cargill announced that they were going to discuss current events and the conversation turned to cases that had dominated the news over the past several months. He asked what specific shootings the class wanted to talk about. Noah Horner spoke up. He wanted to know about Kyle Rittenhouse, the armed teenager who shot and killed two protesters and wounded a third in a confrontation in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

“Me too!” said a woman across the room.

Cargill’s telling of the incident was sympathetic to Rittenhouse, 17, who has been charged with two counts of first-degree intentional homicide. Rittenhouse, he said, was in Kenosha cleaning graffiti from a high school when a local business owner asked Rittenhouse and his friends to protect the man’s property during protests over the police shooting of Jacob Blake. Rittenhouse, who was armed with an AR-15-style rifle, was later chased by protesters, some of whom tried to take his rifle away. He fired his weapon in self-defense, Cargill continued, echoing what Rittenhouse’s lawyers have said. Details about the incident are still emerging. The business owner, for example, has said he didn’t ask anyone for help and it’s still unclear what provoked the confrontation between Rittenhouse and the first protester he shot. Cargill had enough information to render his opinion: The shooting was justified.



He compared Rittenhouse to Ahmaud Arbery, the unarmed Black man who was shot and killed in February after he was pursued by two armed white residents while running near his home in Georgia. The difference between Arbery and Rittenhouse, Cargill said, is Rittenhouse had a rifle. Gregory McMichael and his son Travis McMichael, who were charged in Arbery’s death, were legally carrying their firearms under Georgia law, but Cargill said they weren’t justified in the shooting.

But Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend was justified when he shot at the police who forced their way into her Louisville apartment to serve a warrant, Cargill said. And so, he said, were the officers who returned fire, killing Taylor in her bedroom.

One man, who identified himself as a military veteran from Portland, Ore., wondered whether he would be justified in shooting if he found himself in a situation similar to what protesters reported there—men in generic uniforms dragging demonstrators into unmarked minivans. In this case, the men turned out to be federal agents but that didn’t change Cargill’s opinion.

Under Texas law, Cargill said, “you can use deadly force to stop them.” If you don't know they’re law enforcement and they don’t identify themselves, it's justified. “Unmarked vehicle and plainclothes is suicide,” he told me later.

Finally, Cargill returned to a case that had riveted Austin itself. Daniel Perry, an Army sergeant shot and killed Garrett Foster, an armed Black Lives Matter demonstrator in July. Some people at the scene have said Foster didn’t raise the AK-47 rifle he was carrying, and that Perry, who had made statements on social media critical of protesters, seemed to use his car as a weapon. But Cargill sided with the sergeant. Perry, he said, was justified. Horner, who had recently been watching YouTube videos that dissect shootings, agreed.

“He made a turn and all these guys were in the street,” Horner told me later. “I think that he was justified because they started banging on his car and that guy’s walking up with an AR. That’s pretty scary.”

Horner understands protesting during the day, he said, but after the sun sets, people who want to cause trouble show up. He tries to avoid downtown at night. He’s from Oklahoma, where he attended college in a small town that didn’t see much crime. Arriving in Austin, he said, “immediately you could just tell there’s evil people here.”

But if those fears seem to echo recent Republican talking points about the capital city and a host of other big cities around the country, Horner also said he thinks “this is a pretty important year to vote blue.”

Like Horner, Harris said that there are things about both the major political parties that he and Taylor disagree with. But they’ve been turned off by what feels to them like a president steering the country toward civil unrest. “We’d like a president that would at least not push people to political violence,” he said.

Harris was disconcerted by how some of the people in the license to carry class “almost sounded eager” to shoot someone. But Cargill also dedicated much of the class to discouraging people from drawing their weapons in tense situations. A license to carry is supposed to help you protect yourself and your family, Cargill said—not turn you into a one-person armed security force. Don’t chase down the suspect in a convenience store robbery you happen to witness, he said. Use your phone to take pictures and call the police instead. The last option should be a gun, he explained, because “once you use that gun your life is going to change forever.”

“Do we shoot to kill in Texas?” he shouted. When no one responded, he said it again. “Do we shoot to kill in Texas?”

A few people said yes.

“No!” he said. “We shoot to end the threat.”



If they do end up having to pull the trigger, he told the class, the first call should be to police. But it should be brief, and after they hang up, they should immediately call their lawyer. A lawyer, he said, would protect them against making incriminating statements. Toward the end of the class, a representative for Texas LawShield, a prepaid legal service for gun owners, passed out forms to sign up. Horner started to fill out the paperwork as she made her pitch. He figured that it would cost him a fraction of the amount he’d owe if he had to go court for using his gun. Plus, if they joined that day, the woman said, they could lock in a monthly rate for life.

“You never know when you’re going to need it,” she said. “Especially right now. Everything’s crazy.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/3om7UUO
via 400 Since 1619

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Pence’s chief of staff tests positive for coronavirus


Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, Marc Short, tested positive for Covid-19 on Saturday.

Pence’s office said in a statement that the vice president tested negative Saturday. While he “is considered a close contact” with Short, Pence “will maintain his schedule in accordance with the CDC guidelines for essential personnel,” the statement said.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/37G9Rpk
via 400 Since 1619

Paranoia and finger-pointing in Trumpworld as election approaches


President Donald Trump’s top advisers have plunged into a bitter round of finger-pointing and blame-shifting ahead of an increasingly likely defeat.

Accusations are flying in all directions and about all manner of topics — from allegedly questionable spending decisions by former campaign manager Brad Parscale, to how White House chief of staff Mark Meadows handled Trump's hospitalization for Covid-19, to skepticism that TV ads have broken through. Interviews with nearly a dozen Trump aides, campaign advisers and Republican officials also surfaced accusations that the president didn’t take fundraising seriously enough and that the campaign undermined its effort to win over seniors by casting Democrat Joe Biden as senile.

Finger-pointing is a common feature of campaigns that think they’re losing, but it's happening at an uncommon level in this campaign. Shifting responsibility has been a staple of the Trump presidency — and his lieutenants are now following suit.

Top Trump advisers insist they remain confident, with campaign manager Bill Stepien saying privately the president still has a path to victory. On Friday, Trump's team boasted about his improved debate performance, and said the president had zeroed in on a clear line of attack for the final week: That during his five decades in Washington, Biden had failed to fulfill the promises he's now making.

But senior Republicans say a culture of paranoia has developed in the waning days of the race, with fears mounting that they will be the targets of post-election attacks if Trump loses, which could damage their careers going forward.

“I haven’t worked for Donald Trump since 2015, but I guess nothing changes,” said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump political adviser.

Much of the blame is being directed at Parscale, who was ousted as campaign manager in July amid mounting questions over his stewardship of the reelection effort. Campaign aides say Parscale miscalculated by raising questions about Biden’s mental acuity, which hurt the president among seniors.

But most of the jabs are about money. Campaign officials have accused Parscale of spending lavishly on items such as a $5 million Super Bowl ad and a Trump-branded sky banner that flew over swing-state beaches. Millions of dollars were spent on TV commercials during the early days of the pandemic when voters weren’t receptive to political advertising, and on a massive political infrastructure built far in advance of the election season.



When Stepien took over as campaign manager in July, aides said, the reelection effort had no budget and was on track to go broke. Parscale overestimated how much the campaign would raise in October by $200 million, forcing it to scale back TV advertising. Trump, as a result, has spent some of the precious final hours of the race hosting fundraising events.

Parscale’s defenders say he's being unfairly scapegoated. Every spending decision he made, including the Super Bowl ad, had sign-off from Trump’s top lieutenants, and sometimes the president himself, they said. Much of Parscale’s early spending was devoted to finding new online donors, his backers say.

The former campaign manager felt compelled to invest heavily in advertising in May and June because Trump's poll numbers were sliding amid the onset of the pandemic. With little backup from the primary pro-Trump outside group, America First Action, Parscale felt the need to hit the airwaves. The plan, Parscale allies said, had the support of the president and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Parscale's defenders also contend that Trump’s cash crunch has been overstated. While Trump's political apparatus has $180 million less on hand than Biden's, it’s more than Trump had at the same point four years ago and enough for the final stretch. And it was Trump's idea to cast Biden as senile, with the campaign merely following his lead.

It's not just Parscale getting blamed for Trump's predicament. Some Republican officials are also angry at Meadows for how he managed Trump’s hospitalization. The chief of staff undercut the White House messaging when he told reporters early on that Trump was “still not on a clear path to a full recovery.”

The statement initiated a damaging news cycle, forcing the administration to assure the nation that Trump was in stable condition.

Officials also blame Meadows for not doing more to rein in Trump. Among the complaints: That he should have tried to stop Trump from giving Bob Woodward practically unfettered access as the pandemic intensified, and that he erred in encouraging Trump to hold in-person rallies. Others question why Meadows has so far failed to deliver in congressional negotiations on a coronavirus relief package and worry the inability to get checks to voters could damage the president in the election.

But others argue that it's folly to think that Meadows — or anyone else — could have put guardrails on Trump.


The campaign's TV ads are another source of consternation. Earlier this fall, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel expressed concern to Trump about the lack of TV ads airing in her home state of Michigan. Senior Republicans also express worry that Trump prematurely pulled ads from Ohio, which he's convinced he will win even though polling shows it remains close.

Even Trump has told allies he's not a fan of the content of some of the commercials his own campaign has run.

The dissension has spilled into the final days of the race. In theory, the campaign and RNC are supposed to be working in tandem. But senior Republicans have said the campaign's coordination with the RNC broke down after Parscale's departure, with little communication between the two organizations.

Campaign officials insist things have recently improved and that the breakdown wasn't either side's fault. Reelection campaign and RNC officials, along with Kushner, met on Capitol Hill last week to ensure the two groups are in sync. Also present was Katie Walsh Shields, a former RNC chief of staff whom Kushner has brought in to improve operations. She is being employed by the committee.

Stepien and McDaniel held a conference call with reporters earlier this week to announce the two organizations were launching a joint $25 million TV blitz targeting older adults.

Trump campaign spokesperson Tim Murtaugh said the campaign and RNC “are on the same page headed toward the finish line, we have the same goals, and have agreed on the message and strategy."

RNC spokesperson Mike Reed said two are "totally united in our efforts."

During a Monday conference call with campaign staff, Trump dismissed accounts of division within his ranks and dissatisfaction with Meadows, saying the chief of staff was “doing an incredible job.”

The reports “said I wasn’t happy with him. And you know why they said that? Because that creates bad will, it creates chaos,” Trump added.

Yet Trump himself is getting blame from his team.

Some people close to the president say he is partly at fault for the fundraising downturn. The president canceled some events during part of the pandemic and, unlike Biden, refused to hold virtual fundraisers.

Others expressed frustration over his decision to skip the second debate, which would have been an opportunity for him to gain on Biden, and over his erratic behavior in the closing days of the race. Meanwhile, reelection officials were taken by surprise when on the Monday call when he delivered a 30-minute expletive-filled tirade against myriad targets, including Anthony Fauci.

If Trump goes down, people who know the president say, don’t expect him to take responsibility.

Michael Cohen, a former Trump fixer who has since broken with the president, said the culture of finger-pointing filtered down from a boss who never accepted blame. That, Cohen said, left lieutenants to fight it out among themselves.

“It can never, ever be Trump’s fault,” Cohen said. “That’s the rule.”




from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2Hnlerz
via 400 Since 1619

The MAGAverse tries to summon another Clinton-FBI moment


In the final days of the 2020 race, MAGA world is trying to conjure up the same event that helped them in the home stretch of 2016 — an out-of-left-field FBI investigation into their opponent.

The ingredients are all the same: a seized laptop, leaked emails, insinuations and vague allegations of malfeasance, a hype machine of ardent Trump supporters.

The difference, however, is that this time an FBI investigation is not supplying the ingredients. Instead, MAGA adherents are sourcing the ingredients and hoping they summon an FBI investigation. And, of course, the new target is Joe Biden, not Hillary Clinton.

It’s an eleventh-hour scramble to recreate the situation that arguably helped lift President Donald Trump over Clinton: The FBI announcement, just 11 days before the election, that it was reopening a probe into Clinton after finding more of her State Department emails on a laptop. The move gave Trump and his base last-minute nuggets they needed to spin up claims of corruption, even if many of those claims were merit-free or overstated. Though the bureau closed the probe again just days later after finding nothing, the damage was done.

Now, Trumpworld is leaning on the FBI to essentially make a similar announcement at almost exactly the same time. Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer and self-appointed private investigator, has obtained a laptop he claims belongs to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. He has handed the laptop over to the FBI, claiming it contains emails that show a variety of misdeeds and corruption — even if the emails aren’t all verified, don’t offer conclusive evidence of the misdeeds and bear the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation effort.



And the MAGA base is amping up the pressure on the authorities to investigate. Fox News and One America News Network hosts have dedicated entire segments breaking down the contents of Hunter’s purported emails. Further afield on the internet, conspiracy theorists are tying Hunter Biden to pizzagate-level plots. Trump himself is tweeting loudly about the issue, openly imploring Attorney General William Barr to investigate the Bidens and bringing up the issue whenever possible — at Thursday night’s debate, he even veered from a discussion about race to the “laptop from hell,” with little explanation.

So far, though, it hasn’t amounted to the dramatic moment that fueled Trump in 2016.

“The Clinton email story was — unfortunately, wrongly, foolishly — the main storyline of the entire campaign four years ago,” said Mark Mellman, the CEO of the Democratic polling firm The Mellman Group, pointing out that the details of that saga had been baked into the American consciousness by the end of October. “The fact is, the press gave it consistent heavy attention for more than a year. And that is not the case here. This is coming out of left field.”

To MAGAites, there’s plenty of scapegoats to blame for America’s lack of consciousness over Hunter’s alleged misdeeds: the media, which they accuse of not covering then; social media platforms, which initially tried to limit the story’s spread; and the deep state, which they bash for mentioning the plotline might be part of a Russian intelligence operation.

There’s also the lingering memories of 2016 that Trump backers say are clouding the decision making of these establishment gatekeepers.

In October of that year, the FBI announced it was revisiting the previously closed probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server while leading the State Department. The bureau said it had discovered potential new evidence while investigating Anthony Weiner, then the husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, for sexting a minor. The FBI subsequently closed the probe again two days before the election after finding nothing incriminating. But the story had already dominated the headlines for over a week.

“This is a very common narrative, that James Comey basically tanked Hillary Clinton,” said Neil McCabe, a former correspondent for OANN and the Tennessee Star, an outlet founded by conservative activists. “This narrative is so strong that the mainstream media is literally saying, ‘We will not carry, we will not cover this laptop story at all, because we don’t want anything to get in the way of Biden's victory.’”

This time around, the “Hunter’s emails” narrative has mostly been trapped in the right-wing echo chamber, speaking to the already-converted.

“I'm sure Breitbart readers are very into this, but none of them are voting for Joe Biden to begin with,” Mellman said. “People who aren't regular Breitbart readers don’t know and don’t care.”

There are plenty of external reasons for that. The Hunter Biden stories have been met with concerns about their veracity from the beginning, whereas there was never doubt over whether Clinton did, in fact, use a private email server during her tenure atop the State Department. As a result, most journalists have expressed more caution in their coverage.

Additionally, former national security officials from both parties are warning that the Hunter Biden revelations bear all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. That’s a change from the bipartisan condemnation in 2016 from national security veterans, who said Clinton had potentially exposed her emails to foreign adversaries.

The personal travails of Biden’s son are also not as widely known as the details of Clinton’s private email server, which were picked apart for years on Capitol Hill and in the press before the 2016 election even reached its peak.

And for all of Giuliani’s hype, the laptop’s contents do not conclusively show Joe Biden was acting corruptly, or interceding on behalf of his son, during his vice presidency. Conversely, in 2016, while Clinton was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing, authorities revealed a small amount of secret material had moved through her personal server, even if there was no deliberate mishandling of that information.

“The reality is, she was the candidate. Hunter Biden is not the candidate,” said Mellman. “That, in and of itself, is a big difference.”

There’s also the matter of the coronavirus pandemic, a public health crisis that is overshadowing accusations about Biden’s son, and the fact that Trump now has a presidential track record.

“In 2016, this country hadn’t yet lived through four years of him in the White House,” said Joe Walsh, a former tea party congressman and now an anti-Trump radio host. “But after 221,000 dead, millions and millions unemployed [and] schooling an absolute mess, the American people don’t care about some laptop.”


To McCabe, the OAN correspondent, Giuliani was forced to take the story public because he didn’t trust the FBI to investigate — even if he and others are now demanding an FBI probe.

But, McCabe added, the news of an FBI investigation confers a powerful legitimacy on a claim and can investigate swiftly if needed. He mentioned the example of when race car driver Bubba Wallace’s found a noose in his garage over the summer, an incident that was later determined to not be a hate crime since the noose had been there since October 2019

“I think the FBI sent over like a dozen FBI agents to check it out,” McCabe said. “That was done, like, immediately. There are some things that the FBI takes very seriously.”

Without that legitimacy from a source outside the right wing, the attempt to use Hunter Biden as the 2020 version of Clinton’s emails is highly unlikely to catch on, said Mellman, outside of the die-hard MAGAists who’ve binged-watched that storyline since the beginning of the Democratic presidential primary.

“When [Trump] just talks about a laptop at a debate, most people haven't the slightest idea what he's talking about,” Mellman said.

And, of course, there’s the simplest difference of all: “People didn’t like Hillary. So it stuck,” Walsh said. “People like Biden.”



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/3ooLrXi
via 400 Since 1619

Halloween gets the coronavirus treatment


The White House is throwing its annual Halloween bash this weekend, less than a month after President Donald Trump and about a dozen others tested positive for Covid-19 following indoor and outdoor events for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

Masks will be required for guests older than 2. Hand sanitizer will be provided. The president and Melania Trump will greet trick-or-treaters from the South Portico. Guest capacity will be “limited,” the first lady's office said, without disclosing the expected number of partygoers.

Those planned safeguards take cues from public health experts, but keeping the party on the calendar and Trump off the campaign trail for a few hours close to Election Day broadcasts the White House’s tolerance for risk as the unofficial kickoff to North America’s holiday season begins.

A fall fight pitting personal liberty against public health is unfolding in cities and suburbs nationwide, playing out in Canadian politics, muting Día de los Muertos celebrations and prompting crackdowns on parties in college towns. Families are weighing how children can celebrate autumn traditions after seven months of scuttled schooling, while Halloween weekend’s college football carnival all but ensures that throngs of students will gather not long before they head home for the Thanksgiving break.

“Believe me, as a father I know how disappointing this is for our children,” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said last week. L.A. County originally banned trick-or-treating but later walked back that decision to instead discourage the activity, aligning with state guidance that also prohibits gatherings of more than three households.

“Create your own tradition this year, but create one that is safe,” Garcetti said.

Cities, universities and health officials — armed with fresh CDC guidelines — are pushing the public to avoid big parties and consider new ways of celebrating. Door-to-door trick-or-treating and crowded haunted houses are out. Virtual costume contests and family movie nights are in, along with get-ups that feature cloth face coverings.

“The biggest risk is social gatherings with older teens and young adults for Halloween festivities,” said Emmanuel Walter Jr., a pediatrics professor and chief medical officer of Duke University’s Human Vaccine Institute. “If you potentially mix alcohol in with those types of events, you really risk a high-transmission, super-spreader type of event depending on how big the event is.”

Covid-19 cases are surging throughout much of the United States, while cooler weather threatens to drive more gatherings indoors and potentially aggravate the virus spread. Federal health officials expanded their criteria for who’s at risk of contracting the disease, a move that carries major implications for schools and offices.

Sunday's four-hour White House party for frontline workers, military families and schoolchildren is one half of a split-screen Halloween scene in the United States.



A local ordinance in Beverly Hills, Calif., bans house-to-house trick-or-treating on Oct. 31 and warns violators could face fines of at least $100. Ventura County originally banned trick-or-treating but did an about-face. San Diego County proposed an alternative: “one-way trick-or-treating,” allowing candy-seekers to pick up individually wrapped goodie bags.

After a Labor Day-fueled coronavirus surge at the University of Arizona, system President Robert Robbins said the institution is putting on a massive campaign to cut down big Halloween parties with help from the local police, Tucson Mayor Regina Romero, and the Pima County Health Department. House party hosts risk “red-tagging” sanctions and fines, he said, while students will get referred to the university’s dean of students for conduct violations and potential expulsion.

“We're just doing everything we can to try to limit what's gonna be another potential surge a couple of weeks after Halloween, before they leave on the fall break," Robbins said. "So we're gonna be testing like crazy, isolating and getting people ready to go back home.”

Similar tactics are in store for Madison, Wis., home of the University of Wisconsin’s main campus. The town’s well-known Halloween street festival, now called “Freakfest,” won’t happen this year. Businesses that violate local public health orders face thousands of dollars in fines, while Madison households are encouraged to just leave candy on the porch instead of handing it out. In Chicago, Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s administration wants trick-or-treaters to stay in groups of six or less.

“Trick or treat will not be as normal this year,” said Walter of Duke University. “Understanding that everybody is kind of fatigued from Covid, I just have real concerns about trick or treat as usual, going door to door like we usually think about and large crowds of kids. I just think that’s a perfect way to potentially spread the virus.”

Then there’s Canada, where public health officials in different regions have come up with widely varying Halloween recommendations. Theresa Tam, the country’s chief public health officer, said trick-or-treating should be allowed to proceed with some modifications. She suggested incorporating masks into kids’ costumes, for example. But that didn’t stop health officials in Ontario, Canada’s largest province, from recommending against trick-or-treating a few days later in parts of the province that have been hardest-hit by a resurgence of Covid-19, including Toronto and Ottawa.

That advice prompted a stream of backlash, including from physicians, who argued an outdoor activity where kids can be physically distanced should be reasonably safe. A prominent Canadian health columnist argued the decision was “sheer cruelty” and that public health is about harm reduction, not about “depriving [people] of all pleasure.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who lives in Ottawa, recently confirmed to reporters that his three young children will not be trick-or-treating this year and that his family is considering an Easter-style candy hunt instead.

Yet the White House is pressing ahead.

The party will feature a display of autumn-colored leaves, chrysanthemums and pumpkins. An Air Force string ensemble will be on hand. NASA will display an inflatable rocket. Smokey the Bear will make an appearance. The departments of Labor and Education will display photo backdrops.

The guest list will be capped at an unspecified number of people while federal departments will utilize a “no-touch approach” for distributing goodies to guests, according to the Office of the First Lady, which did not respond to a request for additional comment.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/3onDD80
via 400 Since 1619

Scarred Democrats begin accepting a possible Biden win


Four months ago, Sen. Sherrod Brown predicted Joe Biden will win Ohio and with it, the presidency in a romp. President Donald Trump has ticked up in the state’s polls, but Brown is undeterred.

“I feel stronger about that than I did then,” the Ohio Democrat said in an interview, touting his state’s party infrastructure. “This culture of corruption coupled with Trump’s betrayal of workers says we win Ohio. Win Ohio, we certainly win Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, right? … Ohio with those three is close to an Electoral College landslide and it will feel that way.”

Certainly Brown is more confident than many Democrats still scarred from Hillary Clinton’s surprise loss in 2016. But it turns out that more and more Democrats are coming along to his sunny view of things as the election creeps ever-closer.

That’s not to say feeling upbeat comes naturally to Democrats. Or as Missouri Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver put it: “Every time I get too happy I slap myself and stick my hand over a fire.”

“I’m a nervous ninny,” Cleaver added. “I read the polls … but I’m scared to feel like we’re going to win because we’ve seen what happened in 2016.”

Sure enough, Democrats’ talking points are filled with bromides about taking nothing for granted and working all the way through Election Day, after Trump’s shocking win across just enough swing states to take the Electoral College four years ago. But beneath the surface, there’s growing confidence among key Democrats that things are actually going to go their way this time.


Trump is an unpopular incumbent saddled with a recession and an out-of-control coronavirus pandemic that has killed more than 220,000 Americans. Meanwhile Biden has only seen his favorability ratings increase over time, emerging largely unscathed from Trump’s attacks on him and his son Hunter Biden. And Biden is outspending Trump down the homestretch almost everywhere, further boxing in Trump's path to 270 electoral votes.

Several states that were once considered reaches for Democrats look viable and Midwestern battleground states have generally given Biden a durable lead, fueling a rare good mood in the party known for handwringing.

“There has been a lot more consistency and a lot less volatility to the polling in 2020 than 2016. Joe Biden has had a 4-5 point lead since I think May,” said Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), who handily won reelection in 2018.

"Four years ago at this point I told people that Hillary was going to lose Michigan, I knew it in my gut. Now I think Michigan is competitive," said Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.).

Democrats still face some uncertainty. Trump was less volatile during Thursday evening’s debate and Biden potentially cost himself some votes in key energy-producing states during the last clash of the night. Trump seized on Biden’s comments that he would “transition” away from the oil industry before the former vice president clarified he meant he’d stop giving them federal subsidies if elected.

Still, Biden’s comments had Republicans breathing easier about their prospects for holding the Senate and limiting House losses. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), himself facing a competitive race, said “the president helped all of us that are running in 2020."

“He was more focused on trying to get his points across and willing to let Biden talk. And if it could have lasted longer Biden may have said more things like, ‘I’m going to eliminate the oil industry,’” said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.).

Democrats said the low bar set for Trump by his own party is not one shared by Americans. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) said Trump wasn’t as “belligerent or unsettling,” but that the debate was not the game changer the GOP needs at this late stage.

“This was Trump’s last chance to change the trajectory of the race. And he gained no benefit from last night,” Coons said.

In fact, confidence is increasing so much in the party that red state Democrats are joining in. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said he would be “shocked” if Trump won this time. Trump carried his state by 42 points in 2016, but appears struggling to rebuild that level of support in the Mountain State.

“If Joe Biden gets over 40 percent [in West Virginia] it’s a victory. I think President Trump has worn everybody out,” Manchin said. He claimed even his GOP colleagues are exhausted with the president: “It would be a true relief to my friends on the Republican side” if he loses.



“It feels different” than 2016, agreed Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). “It feels like there’s more urgency now. People have had four years of Trump. And he is so much worse than people expected he would be.”

Still, not every Democrat is ready to crow about a possible Biden victory. Several lawmakers said they’re still reeling from the shock of 2016, when party leaders on down were boasting about a Clinton win only to be blindsided by the FBI’s decision to reopen its investigation into the former secretary of state’s email server just days before the election.

Trump allies have tried to recreate the “October surprise” in relation to Biden and his son’s past work in Ukraine, but with little success so far. Still, Democrats are on edge as so many of the variables that could swing the election — from the record number of mail-in ballots expected to interference efforts by Russia and other foreign adversaries — remain out of their control.

"I’m trying to remain as calm as I can, and not euphoric," Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) said, pointing to Biden's momentum in the polls and the enthusiasm he's seeing in the local get-out-the-vote effort. The one sign that gives him pause, he said, is the GOP voter registration numbers in key battleground states such as Florida and Pennsylvania.

“All leads seem to be holding up. I’m just trying to remember how confident I was in 2016 and stopping myself from getting back in the place,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There’s a lot of reasons to feel this is different. But I’m nervous.”

Other Democrats were even more blunt in their assessment, saying they won’t feel any sense of relief until the polls close on Nov. 3. Moderate Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas was in New York at the Clinton election night party four years ago, preparing to celebrate a landslide victory.

Now some of his fellow Texas Democrats are openly musing about the long-shot chance Biden has at winning the reliably red state if he sweeps the country. Cuellar, though, is not ready to go there because “Trump has a way that you just can’t rule him out.”

“I’ve fundraised for the party, for the Biden campaign, I'm doing extra — putting more money here to make sure he wins my congressional district. People feel good, but again, we've seen this before,” Cuellar said.

Montana Sen. Jon Tester was even more direct in his advice for fellow Democrats: “Run through the f---ing tape.”

Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.




from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/3dVerB4
via 400 Since 1619

‘Well, What Do You Mean, We Can’t Join the Klan?’


On the afternoon of January 28, 1961, at the home of Minister Jeremiah X, the Atlanta minister of the Nation of Islam (NOI), Malcolm X sprang to the living room window and peered through the venetian blinds. Some three dozen white men in civilian clothes sat bolt upright in a 10-car motorcade parking out front of Jeremiah’s house. Each car held three or four men. Neighbors on adjacent porches and other Black people strolling along the paved street scampered out of sight, some glancing back over their shoulders at the long column of four-door sedans. The Harlem firebrand, then the national spokesman for the NOI, and his Atlanta host kept unusually close to each other at the window.

As the dust settled, a patrolman from the Atlanta police drove up to the lead vehicle and rolled down his window. After a brief and seemingly polite chat, the officer slowly drove his squad car away from the parked motorcade, and an eerie calm settled in on the usually bustling neighborhood. Suddenly, the convoy drivers all revved their engines nosily and sped off in the direction of the patrol car. Staring through the window at the dusty scene, a somewhat paler Malcolm seemed transfixed with mixed emotions.

Just as suddenly, the 10-car motorcade of white men rolled back into position in front of the house. A middle-aged passenger in the lead car got out abruptly, strode to the front door, and knocked determinedly. The short and scrawny stranger wore a black fedora with an unusually high crown, “like a witch’s hat,” Jeremiah later said.

“Jeremiaaaah?” he called out.

“Yes, sir,” answered the minister at the screen door. Canting his head to look around Jeremiah’s shoulder, the Witch Hat inquired, “Are you that Malcolm X?” The reply rang just as determinedly, “Yes, sir.”

“You’d lahk ta come in, sir?” asked Jeremiah, mouthing as much of a drawl as the native Philadelphian could muster. The cautious Witch Hat seemed not altogether reassured.

The name of the man at the door was W.S. Fellows, and he was a local Klansman. But this was not an ambush. This was a planned meeting between the Nation of Islam and the Ku Klux Klan, and it had an agenda.

“I’m gonna tell you n-----s something,” said the diminutive white stranger as he gazed up at the lanky Muslim ministers, “If I’m not outta here in 15 minutes, we’re gonna burn this house down.”

***

The meeting began with a telegram that was delivered from the Klan at the end of 1960.

At a Nation of Islam gathering in Atlanta, 33-year-old Jeremiah X rushed up and handed over over the message, as if passing along a burning ember. The communiqué caught Malcolm totally by surprise. It proposed a meeting between the two groups and implied that they had a lot in common. The two Muslim ministers read the cable several times, probing the missive for motive. Who exactly was this W. S. Fellows, who had signed the telegram? The inclusion of his phone number, with an exchange that indicated he lived in the Grant Park section of the city, suggested that he awaited an answer. Was this a veiled threat? A setup? The Klan did not normally send its messages to Black people by day or post them in writing.

Unbeknown to Malcolm and Jeremiah, this initiative from the most violent, self-declared “white racist” group in America was being monitored by the FBI. Director J. Edgar Hoover had long targeted both the Klan and the NOI for surveillance, infiltration, and disruption. The more recent surge of the civil rights movement had also attracted the Bureau leader’s attention in the South. As many as 2,000 paid FBI informant were operating inside the Klan, it later would be revealed.

This penetration allowed the Bureau to control or influence one of every 10 members, or 10 percent of the Ku Klux Klan. This vast government network may well have instigated the Klan’s outreach to the Black Muslims for Hoover’s own ulterior motive, such as the desire to influence or get inside information about the NOI’s plans.

The details of the Klan telegram, and the events that resulted, have never been fully disclosed. Each group determined that its involvement in this cross-racial affair must be kept secret. Records indicate that the FBI monitored the proceedings and kept its notes classified for decades. It also kept secret whatever covert follow-up action the Bureau may have taken against the Klan and the Black Muslims, as well as against civil rights leaders. The original telegram was thrown out, according to Jeremiah X (later known as Jeremiah Shabazz). This account of the matter was pieced together from scattered government records, interviews with participants, group communiqués and notes, personal diaries, and knowledgeable sources.

The meeting was the beginning of an uneasy alliance between the NOI and the Ku Klux Klan on shared goals of racial separation. It was also the beginning of Malcolm’s disillusionment with the Black Muslim organization and his embrace of the more mainstream civil rights movement.

At the time of the meeting, race relations in America had been rocked by the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which had outlawed school segregation. Despite the Supreme Court’s caveat prescribing “all deliberate speed,” the decision inspired civil rights groups to accelerate the pace of desegregation—against stiff white opposition from parents, school boards, governors and congressmen, sheriffs and the terror tactics of the KKK. Spearheading the drive to enforce the ruling were such well-established organizations as the NAACP, the National Urban League, and the Congress of Racial Equality, as well as the newly formed Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), headed by the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.

In the wake of the 381-day Montgomery bus boycott that the SCLC had launched in December 1955, the Klan had stepped up its campaign against desegregation with night-riding attacks, lynching of Blacks and bombings of homes and churches. Cross-burning Klan rallies were staged in open fields—mostly on Friday or Saturday nights, to attract the largest working-class crowds, some bringing along their small children for the fireworks. The racist terror was intended to derail the civil rights movement led by King and other nonviolent leaders.

During these tumultuous days of racial confrontation, the Nation of Islam operated on a third rail, opposing integration from the black side of the race divide.

The Klan invitation led to a meeting in Chicago between Jeremiah, Malcolm and NOI leader Elijah Muhammad, also called the Messenger by adherents, where they mulled over what such a meeting might look like.

Malcolm envisioned himself grabbing the Georgia Klan by the ear—and riding the wolf in its very own den, all at the behest of Elijah Muhammad. Once and for all, a squaring-off with the Klan leader could clarify the Muslim stances on integration, Christianity, mixed marriage, the Jews, miscegenation and even violence. The unbridgeable racial chasm could be explained, and the need for the Messenger’s “separate state” highlighted, all in a highly publicized, Atlanta extravaganza with the white knights—featuring Minister Malcolm X. As Malcolm maneuvered for the key role at the Messenger’s table, Jeremiah X listened quietly.

Elijah Muhammad appeared to have other ideas entirely. He struck a note nowhere near as assertive toward the Klan as Malcolm had hoped.

Dispassionate as usual when asserting NOI doctrine, Muhammad stated that his battle was not against whites but for the lost hearts and minds of Black people. Both the Klan and the NOI, Muhammad summarized, opposed integration and race mixing. Each group was on record as opposing the goals of the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., although for separate and unequal reasons. The Muslims viewed King as a chief rival. The Klan saw him as a dangerous threat to white hegemony. Moreover, Muhammad allowed for no “hierarchy” among Caucasians on the issue of white supremacy; from the sitting U.S. president to the imperial wizard, all were slammed as “white devils.” Accordingly, the Messenger told his two ministers in Chicago that day that the Muslims and the Klan indeed had similar goals but with different shading. Finally, playing his fingers across his lips, Elijah Muhammad calmly instructed a restrained Malcolm and a resigned Jeremiah X: “You can meet with them devils.”

“We want what they want,” Jeremiah remembered the Messenger stating plainly. However, “let them know that you don’t want segregation; you want separation. We want to be totally separated from you. Give us ours and you have yours. We want ours more or less free and clear. Give us something we can call our own. You just tell them devils that.”

Muhammad instructed Malcolm and Jeremiah to pitch to the Klan that white America owed Black people an allotment of land as partial payment for more than 300 years of slavery and Jim Crow exploitation and that the inability of the two races to coexist would be eased by Elijah Muhammad’s setting up of a Black “separate state.” Although a fixed amount of acreage was not specified, Malcolm was instructed to seek an opening to request Klan assistance in acquiring such designated land, or, at least, to negotiate a pact of noninterference with acquisition of land by other means.

Malcolm faced a major conflict of conscience. His hopes for aggressive marching orders were dashed. Instead of sending his ministers striding into the Klan meeting with their bow bent, the Messenger was dispatching them with a begging bowl. In a face-off with the most murderous “white devils” in America, the Nation’s “separate state” program sounded like a plea rather than the assertion that Malcolm envisioned. Unable to dissuade his Messenger, however, he accepted the assignment.

***

After a period of small talk and offers of refreshments, Jeremiah reminded Fellows that he might want to invite the rest of his friends in, given the threat from the top of the meeting. Fellows went outside to call in several lean, middle-aged Klan colleagues.

One was a preacher from south Georgia outfitted in a gray suit and tie. The others were dressed more casually, including a rural politician in long sleeves. Although more nondescript than the diminutive Fellows, his buddies were no less tight-lipped and hard-eyed. At least one of the Klansmen was an FBI informer (a fact likely unknown to the other vigilantes, including Fellows). This undercover man would dutifully file notes on the Muslim meeting, dated January 30, 1961, with his control agent at the FBI Atlanta Field Office. Racial turmoil in the area had become a federal matter.

The gray-haired Fellows, apparently more comfortable now that his buddies were in the room, removed his high hat and repaired with his hosts and associates to the kitchen table, which was spread with Jeremiah’s wife Elizabeth’s sandwiches, cold drinks and cookies. Probing for common ground on their terms, Fellows said that the Klan had gotten a bad reputation in the press. They didn’t really “hate all n-----s,” he said, in an attempt to break the ice. There were “some good n-----s,” he said to the nodding grins of his colleagues. “Some work for me. Our problem is the bad n-----s. You don’t like bad n-----s, yourselves.” Fellows said flat-out that he had “beat a few of these bad n-----s.” One was a “lazy” worker bent on tardiness. “He kept coming to work late, so I took a stick and whipped that n-----,” said Fellows. “He started coming to work on time after that.” Fellows and his men didn’t talk about any of the Klan’s lethal handiwork against Black people.

Malcolm stated firmly that Muslims would do anything to defend their beliefs. Resorting to the cover of NOI doctrine, he implied that there would inevitably be violence between the races one day, especially if Black people in America didn’t acquire some land and separate from the white man. Preemptively, he announced that the Black Muslims were not in favor of the established, legal policy of Jim Crow segregation. At no point during the meeting did the Muslim ministers refer to whites as “devils,” blue-eyed or otherwise, as was their usual practice. Still, the two races were said to be incapable of living together in peace. “God Himself” didn’t intend for them to get along together as brothers and sisters “because we are two distinct people,” and “therefore, the Muslims want complete, total separation,” Malcolm stated.

“The Honorable Elijah Muhammad teaches us” that after hundreds of years of slavery, the Black man in America is entitled to some land, “free and clear,” that he could develop and set up as a separate Black nation, Malcolm said by rote. Exploring the opening, he then stated that his spiritual leader stood willing to accept the help of those white people, including the Klan, who would assist Black people in obtaining this land to “maintain their own businesses and government.” As ordered by the Messenger, the national spokesman of the NOI requested directly that the Ku Klux Klan assist the Muslims in acquiring a piece of land for Blacks, perhaps a county for starters, somewhere in the Deep South. It was pitched as something of a down payment for Blacks who stood absolutely opposed to integration with their open “enemy, the white man,” who hated them without cause.

Having officially placed Elijah Muhammad’s pet proposal on the agenda, Malcolm shifted into fervent, personal eloquence on a major point of clarification: “We are in favor of complete separation of the races—not segregation, separation!”

This stark distinction seemed to puzzle Fellows and the other Klansmen, who nodded quizzically to one another as Malcolm honed more finely the Messenger’s point. The Jim Crow segregation system the Klan was hell-bent on preserving, Malcolm deadpanned, had to date given Black people the short end of the stick, and often no stick at all. In abandoning their pursuit of integration, Malcolm stated, Blacks would need a nest egg so that they could strike out on their own with a separate but appropriate share of the wealth they had helped accumulate in America. Otherwise, civil rights integrationists would end Black and white progress, or at least shatter racial tranquility.

The time was ripe for revamping segregation so that it no longer fixed Blacks at an unacceptably low end of the totem pole. Instead of the existing system, which exploited Black people by rendering them totally dependent upon the white man for food, clothing and shelter, the Black Muslims wanted a new permanent system that was more equitable and truly separate, politically, racially and economically. It was time for the white man in America to sever this Black dependency and allow the Black man to separate and get out on his own.

The Klansmen in the kitchen feigned to grasp the point Malcolm struggled so painstakingly to register. But clearly the Klansmen considered their racial “segregation” and the Muslims’ “separation” as amounting to a distinction without a difference over which the white knights need not quibble.

“It’s all the same thing to us,” Fellows said finally. “Whatever you n-----s want, it’s fine. Call it whatever you like. As long as you stay over there and you’re glad to be Black, good. We just wish all n-----s would be glad to be n-----s.” His previously puzzled colleagues shook their head in firm agreement.

The Klansmen at the kitchen table were all working-class whites with no easy access to the amassed wealth of the South. Yet, they diddled with Elijah Muhammad’s division-of-the-wealth proposition like so many day laborers contemplating the breakup, say, of the United Kingdom. Such geopolitical-economic matters were clearly beyond the grasp of the scrawny, poorly educated Klansmen—as well as the working-class Muslim ministers. With barely a college degree among them, each group worked through the sit-down as self-appointed diplomats for its entire race. The Klansmen, especially, bridled throughout the session, as they assumed the prerogatives of an ersatz ruling class.

“Malcolm was just being provocative” throughout the heady negotiations, Jeremiah recalled, “just leading them on to see where they were going.” In matching wits with the dullard Klansmen ranged around the table, Malcolm trotted out verbal maneuvers from his prison days debating Ivy League scholars, and double entendre from his throwdowns in barbershops, pool halls and churchyards. Adapting the tricky retorts that he shouted atop ladders and flatbeds trucks along Harlem’s 125th Street, Malcolm set debate traps—debate ambushes, debate guillotines—for the Klansmen.

At the critical moment, however, the national spokesman restrained himself from pulling the trap door, laboring as he was under the strictures laid down by Elijah Muhammad—and with Jeremiah X taking note. After all, the assigned NOI mission was neither to score debating points nor to humiliate the Klansmen by smashing their credo to smithereens—as Malcolm forthrightly would have preferred.

Occasionally, the sly hotspur within Malcolm compelled him to disobey his sovereign’s orders that he humbly petition the Klansmen. After being allowed to ease away from the segregation-versus-separation stalemate, Fellows suggested, for instance, that the Muslims might operate as something of a Black franchise of the broader Klan movement. “We can work together,” Fellows said, “and put a stop to this integration.” The direct offer brought a wicked smile across Malcolm’s face that he just as quickly wiped away.

Still, he could not restrain himself. “Well, what do you mean, we can’t join the Klan?” Jeremiah remembered Malcolm saying, wary of where the proposal was heading.

“We’ll make y’all like a partner,” Fellows explained—like an auxiliary.

“Are you going to get us some robes?” Malcolm deadpanned in a manner that had Jeremiah chuckling heartily, but only internally for the moment.

“Well, no, we can’t let no n----- wear a white robe,” the Klansman said, pondering alternatives as Malcolm leaned in over the tripod of his fingers.

“I tell you what, Malcolm,” Fellows finally said, “we can get y’all some purple robes.”

“Oh, no, no, no.” said Malcolm, unwilling to let the opposing leader slip the leash. “We want white robes.”

Returning to the stalemate over racial segregation versus separation, Malcolm chided the Klansmen that they shouldn’t be able to segregate him and give him what they want him to have, instead of what he should have. “If we are going to be partners in this thing, then give us a white robe like what you have.”

“No, we can’t let no n-----s wear white robes,” Fellows insisted, as he gazed back at the puzzled countenances of his colleagues at the table.

“Tell ya what,” Fellows continued, “we’ll bring some purple robes over here and you’ll just have to make do with ’em.”

Point made, Malcolm relaxed the purple-robe tension by allowing the matter to float away as a nonstarter. He then brought Jeremiah and the other Klansmen into the discussion on more general matters, focusing on the Nation of Islam’s taking care of its Black “hypocrites.” Digressing somewhat from instructions, Malcolm stated that violence sometimes was indeed necessary, especially to defend one’s people from those who would lead them astray.

With that opening for violence, Fellows shifted into an even more serious gear, repeating, “We can work together and put a stop to this integration.” The provocative Malcolm again probed for Fellows to state his principal motive for dispatching the KKK telegram that convened the present meeting. Keying on their mutual disdain for race mixing, the Klansman attacked as wrongheaded the current student sit-in demonstrations by Black and white “freedom riders” from the North. Seeking a point of agreement, Fellows extended an invitation for the Muslims to join the Klan in fighting this gathering “scourge of integration.”

And then, revealing a key item on their agenda, Klansman Fellows expressed grave concern over the growing influence in the South of “Martin Luther Coon.”

The mere mention of the 32-year-old Atlanta-based civil rights leader shifted the mood of the room. The international media had made King a clear and present problem for Southern white segregationists, including the knights of the Georgia Ku Klux Klan. In discussing how “Martin Luther Coon” had excited Southern “n-----s” to push for integration, Fellows could barely contain his anger, and his companions flashed tight grins. Elizabeth, observing from the sidelines, was not amused.

By January 1961, Reverend King had come to personify Black people’s relentless push for desegregation throughout the South.

A hometown boy, King had been born in his grandparents’ home, at 501 Auburn Avenue, a block away from his father’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, at 407, where the son was an associate minister.

On the lecture circuit, Malcolm himself had often attacked King as a patsy of the white man and a sellout, and he would do so again. Never had he imagined that this nonviolent Baptist minister, who preached Black kindness and charity for one’s enemies, could evoke such toxic venom, such genuine hatred from the very grassroots whites whom King continually encouraged his followers to love. And yet here was a group of local Klansmen plotting to stalk this nonviolent Black leader toward no good end.

Fellows said they’d noticed in local media that the peripatetic Reverend King was irregularly traveling in and out of Atlanta a lot. Back in 1956, his Montgomery, Alabama, home had been bombed, and ensuing threats created a constant and justified fear for his life and safety. Although King and his family lived nearby, and Jeremiah saw him occasionally at Pascal’s Restaurant and other dining spots, the internationally known celebrity had begun to move around his hometown stealthily and with security details. There were rumors that he had even taken on armed guards.

“We know he lives around here somewhere, but we don’t know where,” said Fellows, in a whisper. He asked Malcolm and Jeremiah directly if the Muslims would reveal exactly where King resided and supply the Klansmen a schedule of his habits and real-time movements when he was in town. Having read Malcolm’s public attacks on King and other civil rights leaders who embraced nonviolence, Fellows had been led to believe that the Muslims saw King as an enemy they had in common. Initially, the Klansman did not state the intended purpose of the surreptitious surveillance—but he left little doubt.

The Klan request embarrassed Malcolm, according to Jeremiah and his wife, and it likely disheartened and shamed him as well. Also, it did not escape Malcolm’s notice that, in contrast to the Christian Reverend King, the Black Muslims drew not a jot of ire from the one white group in America that was universally despised as devils by all Black people, including Malcolm himself. In fact, the Klan was regarding him and Jeremiah, two key ministers of Elijah Muhammad’s Black Muslims, as potential allies. Muhammad had warned his negotiators about Klan skulduggery, but not even the Messenger had anticipated such a cold-blooded request for a joint venture against King. The starkness of the request left Malcolm reeling.

In reply, Malcolm stated emphatically that the Muslims would not participate in any violence against Reverend King or any other action “hurting our own kind.” Even though the Honorable Elijah Muhammad considered Dr. King to be leading Black people astray, his national spokesman stated in as sharp and unmistakable words as Malcolm could muster that the NOI would in no way do physical harm to the SCLC leader. Each of the groups, he repeated, was to take care of its own traitors and hypocrites.

As a white man unaccustomed to Black resistance, and with his Klan cohort cutting their eyes, Fellows maintained the air of a man who had every right to expect compliance. He assured the two Muslim ministers that his group would take care of the dirty work, that nothing would be traceable to their organization. “You don’t have to kill him,” Fellows said flat-out, according to an account Jeremiah subsequently gave during an interview with the author. “We’ll take care of the violence.”

Doubling down, Malcolm made it clear that his objection to such collusion with the Klan was as stark and impenetrable as Stone Mountain. Still, like Elijah Muhammad’s request for Klan assistance in land acquisition, the issue was left dangling. Neither representative at the table had the final say-so on such issues, and each was clearly unaccustomed to such incendiary give-and-take with members of an enemy race group. So the men slid along to lesser sticking points.

***

After the meeting, the 10-car convoy took Fellows and his three dozen henchmen across town and emptied them out at the two-story Tower Theater at 583 Peachtree Street. The Atlanta showplace, with a sweeping marquee that had headlined such movie extravaganzas as Billy Graham’s Souls in Conflict, was this night staging a massive anti-integration rally featuring the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Inc., as the nation’s largest Klan group was officially called.

The Georgia imperial wizard, “Wild Bill” Davidson, unveiled a “secret weapon” to combat integration that included moving all of the Black people in Georgia to a central location, Atlanta, “if necessary,” according to the news account of the rally in the Sunday, January 29, 1961, edition of the Atlanta Journal and Constitution. Although details had not been hashed out, it was clear that Elijah Muhammad’s request for Klan assistance in acquiring a parcel of land had figured somehow in the Klan leader’s boast.

***

Muhammad’s humbling outreach to the murderous Klan had served, finally, to open Malcolm’s eyes.

It was not so much the sit-down itself that unhinged Malcolm, according to Jeremiah; after all, Marcus Garvey himself had met with the KKK’s Imperial Kleagle Edward Young Clarke nearly four decades earlier in Atlanta. The flash point that likely irreversibly shattered Malcolm’s blind devotion to the Messenger was more broadly his Southern strategy—obtaining land to set up a separate Black community—which flowed out of the meeting.

While this pact promised Klan-approved safe passage for Jeremiah and other Muslims in the South, it also committed the NOI to secret cooperation with the death-dealing white knights—who, among their contemporary atrocities, had even openly proposed killing Martin Luther King Jr. The willingness of Elijah Muhammad to overlook the long, bloody history, as well as the mounting terror, of the Klan struck his national spokesman on a deeply personal level. Even before he was born, night-riding Klan horsemen terrorized his pregnant mother and her three older children in Omaha. And he had grown up convinced beyond all arguments that this same Ku Klux Klan had killed his father. (Malcolm’s father died in a streetcar accident in Lansing, Michigan; no connection to white supremacists has been established.)

As for the government informant in the room, it appears that the FBI was chiefly interested in recording any hints of Black Muslim violence, which could be used to discredit the group. The informant’s notes disclosed to date no record of the death threat the Klan proposed against Reverend King. Such an oversight by the informant seems not just curious, but dangerous. It is possible, of course, that the informer himself, especially given his scant report on Klan maneuvers at the meeting, purposefully omitted this, along with other damning information, or, possibly, his account of the King threat resides in some yet undisclosed Bureau report. However, both Jeremiah X and his wife, independently, as well as confidants of Malcolm and other ranking NOI officials, confirmed that W. S. Fellows indeed requested that King be tracked so that his group, which had the motive and the means, could kill him.

After getting expelled from the Muslims three years later, Malcolm would in passing attack the Klan from the podium. However, he never publicly detailed his meeting with the white knights at the kitchen table of Jeremiah X’s house. He also kept what details he knew away from his wife, Betty, and even from his older brother Wilfred, with whom he ended up sharing almost every other dark secret of his risk-taking career. His published autobiography, originally conceived largely as a tribute to Elijah Muhammad, did not mention a single word about the secret 1961 meeting.

Excerpted from The Dead Are Arising: The Life of Malcolm X by Les Payne and Tamara Payne. Copyright (c) 2020 by the Estate of Les Payne. Used with permission of the publisher, Liveright Publishing Corporation, a division of W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. All rights reserved.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2ITOM02
via 400 Since 1619

Black Faith

  • Who are you? - Ever since I saw the first preview of the movie, Overcomer, I wanted to see it. I was ready. Pumped. The release month was etched in my mind. When the time...
    4 years ago

Black Business

Black Fitness

Black Fashion

Black Travel

Black Notes

Interesting Black Links

Pride & Prejudice: Exploring Black LGBTQ+ Histories and Cultures

  In the rich tapestry of history, the threads of Black LGBTQ+ narratives have often been overlooked. This journey into their stories is an ...