Translate

Tupac Amaru Shakur — “I'm Losing It… We MUST Unite!”

Where To Start

Start Here Start at 1619. Move forward.

The Arc is the spine of this project: 40 essays, one chronological argument, five analytical lenses.

The 40 Arc Essays — Canon Index → Full reading order · 1619 to the present · All 40 essays live

This site should read like a structured archive, not a loose category list. The Arc is the entry point; the lenses help you move through it with intention. Empty sections stay hidden until they are live.

Monday, August 3, 2020

Democrats to introduce legislation to tighten DHS intel oversight


Members of Congress responsible for oversight of the Department of Homeland Security will introduce legislation strengthening its internal civil rights office, they announced Monday.

The move comes after POLITICO reported that a top DHS official limited the ability of that office to oversee the work of the department’s intelligence arm.

Several months ago, the department’s second-in-command constrained the ability of DHS’ Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) to review intelligence products from the department’s Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A). After making that change, I&A released intelligence reports to law enforcement partners with information about journalists and protesters — sparking national criticism.

On Tuesday, Reps. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Max Rose (D-N.Y.) will introduce legislation mandating reviews of I&A intelligence products by the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, they announced. The legislation will also mandate that CRCL train top I&A officials on civil rights and civil liberties, according to the release announcing their plans. Thompson chairs the House Committee on Homeland Security, and Rose chairs its subcommittee on intelligence and counterterrorism.

“We can no longer assume that the right thing is going to happen, that this office will no longer be politicized and won’t do things that, quite frankly, infringe on people’s constitutional rights,” Rose told POLITICO. “And so we have to mandate it.”

“I would be doing this if there were a Democrat in the White House and this had happened,” Rose added. “This is ridiculous!”

The Washington Post reported last week that I&A released an intelligence report about journalists covering the department’s response to protests against racism and police brutality in Portland, Ore. The news generated concern in DHS, and department leadership removed Brian Murphy — who had been running I&A — from his post, and reassigned him. But that demotion hasn’t quelled concerns on Capitol Hill. On Monday, the House Intelligence Committee announced it has opened an investigation into I&A.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/30oaWhd
via 400 Since 1619